Mounting evidence suggests that traumatic brain injury (TBI) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) resulting from military exposures increase the risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The military population face a unique set of risk factors that may increase the risk of being diagnosed with dementia. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have a higher prevalence in this group in comparison to the civilian population. By delving into the individual relationships between TBI and dementia, and PTSD and dementia, we are able to better explore dementia in the military and veteran populations. While there are some inconsistencies in results, the TBI-dementia association has become more widely accepted. Moderate-to-severe TBI has been found to increase the risk of being diagnosed with Alzheimers disease.
Research reports that Government armed forces and non-state armed groups have unlawfully attacked and killed older civilians and subjected them to summary executions, arbitrary arrest and detention, torture and other ill-treatment, rape, abduction and kidnapping, and the destruction of their homes and other property. Older civilians have been killed and injured by small arms, heavy weapons, explosive weapons with wide area effects and chemical and other banned weapons. In Syria in March 2017, United States aircraft attacked the Omar Ibn al-Khatab mosque near al-Jinah, a village in Aleppo province, where about 300 people had gathered for religious lectures and the Muslim Isha’a, or night prayer. The attack killed at least 38 people. “Mahmoud,” who witnessed the attack, said: “Some were old in their 70s and 80s, some young in their 20s, children. There weren’t any people affiliated with armed groups there, nothing of that sort.”
Sleep problems have been observed to occur in those following TBI, PTSD and deployment. Poor sleep has been associated with possible dementia risk. Although limited studies have focused on the link between sleep and dementia in military and veteran populations, sleep is a valuable factor to study due to its association and interconnection with other military veteran factorsGovernment forces and non-state armed groups have summarily executed older people. In the Central African Republic, where a proliferation of armed groups has been fighting since 2013, Seleka forces executed Dieudonne, a 60-year-old man who had been hiding in a family compound nearby a displacement camp in July 2017. Government forces and non-state armed groups have arbitrarily arrested and detained older civilians. In Ethiopia in July 2021, after Tigrayan forces recaptured most of the Tigray region, authorities arbitrarily arrested and detained older Tigrayans in the capital, Addis Ababa. Amhara forces controlling the Western Tigray zone also detained older people in overcrowded detention sites and subjected them to beatings and other forms of ill-treatment.
Governments and non-state armed groups have subjected older people in their custody to various forms of torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. Common cases reported include beating and kicking, use of stress positions, and sexual violence, as well as denying medical treatment, food, and water. In Mali, where Islamist armed groups and Malian security forces have engulfed civilians in conflict, a 60-year-old shepherd described his interrogation by Malian soldiers in 2015. Armies, militias, and rebel forces have destroyed and looted older people’s property. Older people have described the devastation of losing everything they have spent their lives working towards. In May 2021, Israeli military airstrikes destroyed four high-rise buildings in Gaza City that contained many homes and businesses. Jawad Mahdi, 68, an owner of a destroyed building who lived there with dozens of family members, said “All these years of hard work, it was a place of living, safety, children and grandchildren, all our history and life, destroyed in front of your eyes.
During hostilities older people have chosen not to flee their homes when fighting neared. They thought they would not be attacked, or wanted to protect their family’s property, or had suffered physically or emotionally from fleeing earlier attacks. In many other instances, older people have been unable to flee because of limited mobility, disability, or because families could not assist their flight. In 2017, Rohingya who fled Myanmar security force atrocities in Rakhine State described security forces pushing older people who could not flee back into burning houses. I think they wanted everyone to leave and those that could not leave they put into the fire. Older people who have been displaced have faced abuse while in flight or in displacement camps. In the Far-North region of Cameroon, the Islamist armed group Boko Haram carried out attacks deliberately targeting civilians.
A story of a person left the house and saw numerous Boko Haram fighters outside. As they ran away for my life, they shot me in the stomach. They found themselve on the ground, an inexplicable pain striking my body. And was bleeding profusely, and had lost consciousness. Displaced older people have also faced barriers to registering for and obtaining humanitarian assistance. In South Sudan in 2017, displaced older people who sought refuge in remote bush areas or on islands were more likely to encounter difficulties getting aid than those who found their way to the Protection of Civilian sites inside UN bases. Other groups have documented similar abuses against older people affected by conflict. For example, Amnesty International has published reports on crimes under international law and other abuses against older people in conflicts in Mozambique, Myanmar, Northeast Nigeria, and South Sudan. HelpAge International, a non-governmental organization working with and for older people, has documented the failure of humanitarian actors to meet humanitarian standards and be inclusive of older people in their responses to conflict driven displacements in Ethiopia, Jordan, South Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, and Yemen. While older people are protected by international humanitarian law and international human rights law during armed conflict, in practice their needs and protections are often disregarded by the parties to the conflict. Governments, non-state armed groups, peacekeeping missions and the relevant United Nations agencies should do more to ensure adequate recognition and protection of older people from abuse during conflict.
The UN Secretary Generals Protection of Civilian reports from 1998 to 2021 have paid little attention to older people with five brief mentions. The Secretary-Generals 2019 report on older people in emergency crises, including those due to armed conflict, addressed barriers to humanitarian assistance but not abuses during conflict itself. Only one UN Security Council resolution, on Sudan in 2007, has condemned violent attacks on older civilians. Because of the heightened risk they may face, older people require special attention by UN agencies and peacekeeping missions, aid organizations, governments, and others who have the ability to aid and offer protection to people in conflict situations and in humanitarian responses to older people displaced by conflict. All parties to armed conflict should protect and prevent abuses against older people and facilitate humanitarian assistance to older people in need. States should end impunity for crimes against older people and ensure their access to justice.
International humanitarian law says nothing about the age at which an individual is considered to be elderly. The Commentary on the Fourth Convention does, however, give an indication: “No limit was fixed for ‘aged persons’. The Conference refrained from naming a definite age, preferring to leave the point to the discretion of Governments. 65 seems, however, to be a reasonable age limit. It is often the age of retirement, and it is also the age at which civilian internees have usually been released. As far as the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) is concerned, this is the threshold adopted for its activities in aid of the elderly. A certain degree of flexibility is, however, essential, and it is quite possible that assistance may be given to persons below the age of 65 but rendered especially weak and vulnerable by a physical handicap.
Protection of elderly members of the civilian population. Under international humanitarian law, the elderly are protected as persons not participating in the hostilities.
On the one hand, they enjoy protection from abusive behaviour on the part of the party to the conflict in whose power they are, being persons protected by the Fourth Geneva Convention. As such, they benefit from all the provisions that set forth the fundamental principle of humane treatment. In situations of non-international armed conflict, they are protected by Article 3 common to the four Geneva Conventions. On the other hand, as members of the civilian population they benefit from the rules of international humanitarian law relating to the conduct of hostilities. These rules, which uphold the principle of distinction between civilians and combatants and prohibit attacks directed against the civilian population, were given written expression in the Additional Protocols of 1977. The elderly also enjoy special protection because of their weakened condition, which renders them incapable of contributing to their countrys war effort.
Although the principle of equality of treatment is enshrined in several provisions of humanitarian law, the law does allow for exceptions whereby more favourable treatment is granted in certain circumstances. Article 27, paragraph 3, of the Fourth Geneva Convention states: ” Without prejudice to the provisions relating to their state of health, age and sex, all protected persons shall be treated with the same consideration by the Party to the conflict in whose power they are, without any adverse distinction based, in particular, on race, religion or political opinion. But it is an uncomfortable truth that while war does not discriminate, the international response does. Time and again, the toll of war on older people is overlooked as they struggle to survive and piece together a new normal. As this conflict unfolds, there are millions of older people confronting the scourge of war, isolated and alone.
One in three of the people needing assistance after the Russians invaded eastern Ukraine in 2014, were over 60, making it the worlds oldest humanitarian crisis. Yet the international community failed to recognise this, failed to identify and respond effectively to meet their specific needs. For many, conflict was not new, having lived through World War II, Soviet rule and the road to independence. Their bodies, minds and communities were already scarred. The local economy was on its knees, poverty and long-term unemployment had rocketed. Younger people had left for work elsewhere, leaving older relatives alone with nobody to care for them. There was no electricity or gas. Untreated chronic health conditions like diabetes and high blood pressure had caused many to lose their independence, develop disabilities and face unnecessary suffering. The fear of intermittent shelling and the risk of landmines was constant.
The contact line exacerbated isolation for so many. Those who lived in non-government-controlled areas, could only access healthcare and pensions by enduring long queues and bureaucracy to cross the line into government held territory. By 2019, more than 450,000 of the 1.2 million pensioners living in areas outside of government jurisdiction were surviving without a basic income because they were required to register as an internally displaced person to receive their pension. Not only were they living in a state of war, they could barely afford basic food supplies or medication.
A survey of more than 1,500 older people in eastern Ukraine at the beginning of March and found that 99% of older people in Donetsk and Luhansk had no plans to leave. For many, mobility difficulties mean leaving is not possible. Many do not have families nearby to help. Worse still, many cannot even reach the local shelters, making them sitting targets. Older people often remain at home in times of conflict. Some may stay because they do not want to be a burden to their families, they want to protect their home, or simply because of moving so many times before. But the body vest of being older is no protection for the barbarity of war. And the hand of assistance frequently fails to reach them in its aftermath. As the war sweeps further into Ukraine, there will be more older people left behind, isolated and in urgent need of food, water, heating, and mental health support. 25% of Ukraine’s population is over 60 years old.
Russias full-scale invasion of Ukraine, which began on 24 February 2022, has been characterized by a flagrant disregard for civilian life and frequent war crimes. Russia has indiscriminately attacked Ukrainian cities, including with banned weapons, committed extrajudicial executions in areas under its control, and targeted clearly marked civilian infrastructure in places like Mariupol. More than 13,000 civilians in Ukraine have been killed or injured a number the United Nations says is likely an undercount – and millions have been forced from their homes. Ukraine, where people over 60 years old make up nearly one-fourth of the population, is one of the “oldest” countries in the world. According to HelpAge International, the proportion of older people affected by the war in Ukraine is higher than that of any other ongoing conflict. This report shows how intersecting challenges, from disability to poverty to age discrimination, are compounded in emergency situations, putting older people at heightened risk.
Often reluctant or unable to flee their homes, older people appear to make up a disproportionate number of civilians remaining in areas of active hostilities, and as a result they face a greater likelihood of being killed or injured. Amnesty International documented several cases in which older people who stayed behind were hit by shelling or sheltered in harrowing conditions. Even when they succeed in escaping such dangers, older people face distinct challenges in displacement. In particular, this report explores how the war has negatively impacted the rights of older people in Ukraine to adequate housing and to full inclusion and participation in their communities. Once displaced by the conflict, older people are often locked out of the rental market by pensions that are well below real subsistence levels, particularly since rental prices have increased at an alarming rate. Support for older people who have disabilities is rarely provided in temporary shelters. As a result, at least 4,000 older people have been given no option but to live in state institutions for older people and people with disabilities. While the goal of this policy is undoubtedly benevolent, it is in conflict with the rights of older people with disabilities, segregating them in isolated settings where they can be subject to abuse.
Those older people who remain in their homes in conflict affected areas often do so because they have no alternative housing options or face greater difficulty evacuating. Many live in partially or fully destroyed housing that is dangerous to inhabit, lacking functional roofs, windows, electricity or heating, and without access to healthcare facilities, grocery stores or pharmacies. Information about evacuation plans, and evacuation routes themselves, are not always accessible to older people or adapted to their needs. In addition to the risk of being killed or injured, older people experienced health emergencies that went untreated as a result of staying in conflict-affected areas.
According to the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), nearly one-third of Ukrainians have been displaced by the conflict: 6.2 million people remain displaced within Ukraine, and 7.8 million are estimated to be refugees across Europe. According to the International Organization for Migration (IOM), about half of internally displaced families have at least one member who is over 60 years old. While there is no reason to believe that older people have experienced more damage to their homes than other groups, many face several intersecting risk factors, including poverty, employment discrimination, disability and health conditions, that make accessing housing more challenging for them in displacement.
Older people are more likely than other groups to have a disability. In the European Union (EU), nearly half of people over 65 report difficulties with at least one personal care or household activity, and the numbers are higher among newer member states in eastern Europe. In Ukraine, more than half of those people registered as having a disability are of pension age. Before the war, many older people with disabilities interviewed for this report had lived in apartments or homes that were adapted to their physical needs, such as with ramps or handrails. Older people with disabilities relied on formal and informal networks of family members, friends, neighbours, paid care workers or social workers to provide them the support they needed at home. Displacement shattered those support systems.
The catastrophic nature of war has deleterious impact on almost all individuals of the affected populations; amongst them older adults are known to be one of the most vulnerable groups. Along with the life changing economic and social adversities, the physical and mental health of the older adults are seriously impaired secondary to war. The consequences are immediate; but most continue long-term in fact, experiences of the war have lifelong impact. In addition, people who are exposed to war in younger age continue to have health related morbidities in the old age. There are enormous needs for protection, support and care of older adults during and in post-war situations. While efforts should be taken to mitigate the devastating effect of the war on all, including the elderly people it is important to prevent war at all costs.
Journal of Geriatric Care and Research 2022, Volume 9, Number 1 Editorial War and older adults consequences and challenges. The catastrophic nature of war has deleterious impact on almost all individuals of the affected populations amongst them older adults are known to be one of the most vulnerable groups. Along with the life changing economic and social adversities, the physical and mental health of the older adults are seriously impaired secondary to war. The consequences are immediate; but most continue long-term in fact, experiences of the war have lifelong impact. In addition, people who are exposed to war in younger age continue to have health related morbidities in the old age. There are enormous needs for protection, support and care of older adults during and in post-war situations. While efforts should be taken to mitigate the devastating effect of the war on all, including the elderly people it is important to prevent war at all costs. Aged, Health, Mental Health, Psychological Stress, War affects every body. It does not discriminate between any sides.
The interconnectedness of the world today is such that the impact of war is felt thousands of miles away even by the people who are not directly related to the war. As lives change, communities become displaced, people migrate, the overall influence of a war could be seen over generations of affected people. War is one of the greatest threats to the health and wellbeing of societies and it often continues to have impact over a life time and beyond. In fact, individual and community health are the immediate casualties of the war and these are often catastrophic in nature for affected populations. One of the major consequences of war is its deleterious effect on the mental health of the population; and the suffering could be intense considering the magnitude of losses. Besides lives and properties, the meaning of life is lost as well for many. Associated economic and social consequences of the war also affect communities and bring additional challenges for healthcare. While the trauma of war impacts everyone, it is the older adults who are one of the most vulnerable groups for the immediate and long-term consequences.
Their lives are irreparably damaged, with significant loss of lives of young generations ahead of them, their own failing health and without any hope of returning to previous socio-economic cultural stability, the psychological stress is catastrophic. Additional stressors along with the death and destruction, there are serious abuses of people, including older adults, during the war. These include arbitrary arrest and detention, abduction and kidnapping, torture, physical injury by various means, rape, executions, and other ill-treatmen in inhuman conditions. Many are confined to places without food and basic necessities. These stressors compound the problems people face during the conflicts. Immediate concerns of people migrate away from the war zones starting with the young and capable ones. Older people usually do not wish to leave their place, for emotional connectedness, and to protect their property but often logistics and health related issues come in the way. Understandably, they are often the last to move from the dangerous conflict areas. During displacement, older people are at particular risk of abuse and neglect because of their mobility issues, diminished vision and chronic illnesses which make the support process more difficult.
In the exile, they are socially isolated, and are often physically separated from their families, which increase their vulnerability further. There are massive concerns about the care and support of people who are displaced to different areas and countries as refugees. There are many practical issues: lack of basic necessities of life, overcrowding, separation from family members with no contact with each other, language and sociocultural differences presenting as barriers for effective support, overstretched health systems not being able to cater to the needs of large number of the displaced people, etc. All these affect elderly refugees harder. There remains a very limited healthcare support system for the older adults who stay back in the war torn regions, due to direct consequences of the destructions, there are damaged health care facilities, inadequate availability of medicines and clinical supply, and fewer numbers of healthcare personnel. All these lead to a highly diminished health service, meagre support and negative health outcomes. There are massive challenges for the health-care of everybody, especially the elderly, who would have an already compromised health status.
The world is aging rapidly, not a new phenomenon. In 2020, one billion people worldwide were 60 years or older about 13 percent of the total population. By 2050, one out of five people will be over 60, and more than 80 percent will live in low-income countries affected by humanitarian crises including conflict, natural disaster, and famine making these numbers a major concern. While the General Assembly of the United Nations has recognized older adults as a vulnerable group in humanitarian crises, traditionally, this population has not been prioritized for humanitarian assistance, and humanitarian responses have largely overlooked their needs. Despite global commitment, evidence still indicates that older adults face formidable barriers to accessing health services in low and middle-income nations during humanitarian crises. A dramatic example is the current war in Ukraine. The conflict in Ukraine is considered the “oldest” humanitarian crisis in the world given the large number of older adults who have been affected by it.
Many comments reflect the reality that in most states and localities, seniors housing and care is not being prioritized for the supplies and support that it needs, despite the fact that these communities are caring for millions of high-risk frail elders. The odds of experiencing recent PTSD symptoms are greater in respondents who report involvement in killing causing severe injury and who observed war atrocities. In women, PTSD is positively correlated with war era child death and spousal separation. Arthritis also exhibits a significant, positive association with killing causing severe injury. Our study provides insights into the burden of conflict upon health among populations of the global south that survived war and are now entering older adulthood. The pattern of results, indicating greatest suffering among those who inflicted or failed to prevent bodily harm or loss of life, is consistent with the concept of moral injury.
Attacks against women human rights defenders are extremely under reported and anonymized in official United Nations statistics. In general, women are much more likely than men to be targeted with sexual and gender based violence and to be subjected to verbal abuse, surveillance, and online violence. While all activists are targeted with defamation, smear campaigns, and online and offline hate speech, the attacks against women human rights defenders typically target their personal behaviour, their moral conduct. It was estimated that in 2020, there were 5.8 million people aged 65 years and over living with the Alzheimer’s sub-type of dementia in the United States.